A battle of love for Anna Mae

The six year battle for a little girl caught between two families and two different cultures has its happy ending for the biological parents of nine year old Anna Mae He. The nine years old girl was raised by an American couple in Tennessee shortly after she was born in the United States to Chinese parents Jack and Casey He. At that time the young Chinese couple had recently come to the United States when Jack was set to pursue a doctorate at the University of Memphis, in Tennessee.

After years of being discriminated against due to their foreign origins and economic lack of standing the He family had the break through they so hoped for but were denied for so many year before. The tides of good fortune recently returned in favor of Anna Mae's Chinese birth parents after the Tennessee Supreme Court decision ruled for the child to be returned to her birth parents sighting that the parents were coerce into giving up their child and therefore the adoption would not stand. The elated re-united family have since arrived in Beijing with Anna Mae.

This battle for the child rose to that of international attention with two families torn apart. The matter of adopting foreign children is an awesome legal undertaking that is so often measured by American economic wealth verse the poverty of the foreign child's background or biological family when neither of these factors should ever dictate who is a more suitable parental scenario for the child in question. Biology should always be the deciding factor above all other circumstances and of course the written rule and letter of the law closely behind. If a child is not legally adopted then the law is very clear. If fraud, deception of any kind, or coerced obtainment of the biological parent or parents is a the foundation of the adoption then the adoption is invalid and of no lawful merit whatsoever.

It is sheer arrogance on the part of many American who acquire children from foreign parenting under shady circumstances who then believe themselves entitled to retain the child no matter how many broken or disregarded laws have been over looked or out righted ignored. Children have a right to know where they have come from and those who take on children of living parents especially those who knowing take on adoptions of children who's parents are alive and well when their are so many legitimate orphan in the world than it is at your own folly and fault when the biological parents come forward wanting their flesh and blood back.

We at Excalibur-One applaud the Chinese families corage and fortutide in seeing their battle for the return of their biological child and wish them and theirs the very best in their future renite and together.

Brad Pitt and The Hypocrisy Of It ALL

Brad Pitt has been going large in his public campaign for funding his New Orleans Make It Right project since not receiving a Golden Globe nod for neither his Jess James flick nor himself as lead actor. He confirms boastfully that thousands have pledged funding to his New Orleans project and millions have been raised. People make as much as $1 million New Orleans pledges and pay them.

So, what is Angelina Joile’s excuse for not paying her financial pledges to the Cambodian Vision in Development Charity and its director Mounh Sarath of which she has defrauded them some $6.5 million to date. How is that possible that Brad sat around and let this woman get away with not paying that money a whole year after her negation of funding and questionable motives humanitarian was exposed and then goes on TV asking people for money for his project instead with a smile?

Angelina's tragic excuses for not paying have been a many. Including, that of how she thought the Cambodian project would not work so therefore gets away with not paying the signed agreement pledges made. This is in spite of the fact that she went to them and not the other way around offering to pledge financially. Instead, of actual payment she went onto exploit them for publicity before having gullible Brad to use.

Ironically, this sudden revelation of hers of the project allegedly not working came after several years of exploiting the poor Cambodian country’s charity in the media then being well behind in her payment schedule comprised of a five year payment plan to pay $1.5 million and a separate payment plan also over five years to pay $5 million. In the several years that that agreement stood in place before her unfortunate negation of funding she paid as little as just over half a million dollars.

Hum… So, nor Brad Pitt or Angelina Jolie has come forward to pay off her debt to Director Sarath of CVD and her charity agreement named after her son Maddox, because Angelina can change her mind about NOT paying the money she pledged. However, as according to them the African MOTHER can not change her mind about wanting her African child back… Why?

I am so confuse as these celebrities vulgarly flaunted themselves everywhere and somehow are allowed to change their mind, but POOR black Africa woman can NOT change her mind and take back the child she gave birth to from her body herself.… Are Angelina and Brad exhibiting elitism nonsense or what!!!!!

What arrogance? They should give Zahara back to her mother if Angelina is allowed to change her mind over paying Sarath then surely a rape victim mother can change her mind about the child she bore from her FLESH and BLOOD! Hollywood home-wrecker signed legal agreements to pay pledged money then said she thought the project Cambodian project would not work and the raped African mother’s mother thought her raped daughter would not be able to keep the child, but the Africa child's biological mother came forward wanting her child back.

So, who should be allowed to get away with changing this mind, REALLY? The Hollywood celebrities or the poor black African’s. Excalibur-one sends Christmas wishes to the African family of Zahara.